Legal Opinion
Commission v. C & P Telephone Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 3, 1993No. Civ. A. 93-158 SSHPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
Before the Court is the application of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) for the issuance of an Order to Show Cause why an administrative sub poena, issued by the EEOC on June 8, 1992, should not be enforced. The Court conditionally grants in part and denies in part the EEOC’s application.
Background
On October 4, 1991, the Communication Workers of America (“CWA”) and Felicia Sharp filed charges of discrimination against respondents C & P Telephone Company, C & P Telephone Company of Maryland, C & P Telephone Company of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Endicott Johnson Corp. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kronos Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- EEOC v. Ferrellgas, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. City of MilwaukeeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1999
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Morgan Stanley & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. EkasalaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.