Legal Opinion
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Ekasala
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 31, 2014No. Misc. No. 2014-0318PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Re Document No.: 9
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying Respondent’s Motion to Quash Subpoena and/or Change Venue,' and Requiring Respondent’s Compliance with Administrative Subpoena
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
This action arises out of the Respondent’s failure to comply with a subpoena issued by the Division of Enforcement of the Petitioner, the United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”). The Respondent now moves this Court to quash the subpoena and, if the subpoena is not quashed, to change venue. For the reasons set forth below, the Respondent’s motion…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Applicant-Appellee, v. BAY SHIPBUILDING CORPORATION, Respondent-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Resolution Trust Corporation v. William L. Walde, Resolution Trust Corporation v. Solomon F. Schick, John C. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Federal Trade Commission v. Invention Submission CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Bowles v. Bay of New York Coal & Supply Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Future Income Payments, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and SchoolsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Camden Development, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2025