Legal Opinion

Town of Fremont v. Baker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 8, 1952No. 239PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarNHILl, J.

While in appeals of this character from an order granting or denying injunctive relief, the findings of fact made by the court below are not conclusive and binding on this Court, a careful examination of the record discloses no reason why we should at this stage of the proceeding undertake to revise the facts found by the court below. Smith v. Bank, 223 N.C. 249, 25 S.E. 2d 859; Gaines v. Manufacturing Co., 234 N.C. 340, 67 S.E. 2d 350. The essential facts on the rule to show cause sufficiently appear in the findings made by the court below.

The plaintiff stressfully contends that it has…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Whichard v. LipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Gaines v. Long Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Whichard v. . LipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Thompson v. . UmbergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Chesson v. . JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Huggins v. Wake County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Huskins v. Yancey HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Huskins v. Yancey Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Douglas Aircraft Co. v. Local Union 379 of International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. GLYK v. Winston-Salem Southbound Railway Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API