Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Martin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 7, 2002PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLahtinen, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 29, 2001, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant was employed as a certified nursing assistant until his employment was terminated due to his failure to adhere to the employer’s policy regarding the operation of a device known as a Sarah Lift, used to transfer patients between two seated postures (e.g., between a wheelchair and a commode). Claimant admitted in his hearing testimony that he had been…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Claim of WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of MartenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of HeintzlemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Claim of CedroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re the Claim of SheneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of NicholasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of PowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of CaporaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004