Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Heintzleman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 21, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 3, 2000, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was employed by a nursing home as a certified nursing assistant. She was discharged from this employment after she attempted to perform a medical procedure that she was not trained or authorized to perform and for which she used the wrong equipment. Specifically, claimant inserted a plastic tube from a nebulizer* into a patient’s mouth in an attempt to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re the Claim of ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. In re the Claim of MeagherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. In re the Claim of SheneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. In re the Claim of ApiadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API