Legal Opinion
Dal Maso v. County Commrs.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 3, 1943No. [Nos. 2 and 3, October Term, 1943.]PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This appeal is from an order sustaining a demurrer to a petition for mandamus, which the petitioners had filed to the defendants' answer, the court holding that the petition was insufficient, and the demurrer mounting up to the first error in pleading, it should be and was sustained and the petition dismissed, from which the petitioners appeal.
It appears from the petition that on April 17, 1942, application was made by the appellants, Joseph Dal Maso and Leo Dal Maso, to the Maryland-National Capitol Park and Planning Commission for the rezoning of their property at Riverdale in Prince…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Board of Zoning Appeals v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Tighe v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
- Hoover v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Levin v. HewesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
- Humphreys v. WallsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Attorney General v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Department of Natural Resources v. Linchester Sand & Gravel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Reyes v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Shell Oil Co. v. Supervisor of AssessmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Mayor of Annapolis v. Annapolis Waterfront Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.