Legal Opinion

Bastain v. Brown

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 10, 2000No. ED 77460PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant, Thomas E. Brown, 1 appeals pro se from the judgment entered by the circuit court against him after a trial de novo on a small claims action brought by plaintiffs Travis Bastain and Celestine Bastain. On appeal, defendant challenges the trial court’s failure to consider certain evidence adduced at trial. We dismiss the appeal on the ground that the record on appeal is insufficient under Rule 81.12(a) to review the appeal, because defendant failed to file a transcript of the trial de novo.

Rule 81.12(a) provides that the record on appeal shall contain all of the record, proceedings…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coyne v. CoyneMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Environmental Quality Research, Inc. v. Mercantile Trust National Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Snelling v. StephensonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Lake Tishomingo Property Owners Ass'n v. KleinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Central America Health Sciences University, Belize Medical College v. NorouzianMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. The Salvation Army, Kansas and Western Missouri Division v. Bank of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Jaggie v. AttaranMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Powell v. PowellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. D.B. v. D.H.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API