Legal Opinion

Cudworth v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 2004No. 79A02-0312-CR-1037PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Troy Cudworth appeals his convictions for Conspiracy to Commit Dealing in Methamphetamine, a Class B felony, and Possession of Chemical Reagents or Precursors with Intent to Manufacture Controlled Substances, as a Class D felony, 1 following a jury trial. Cudworth raises three issues on appeal, one of which we find dispositive, namely, whether the trial court abused its discretion when it denied Cudworth's motion to suppress evidence.

We reverse.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On September 22, 2002, Amy Clements and Cudworth lived together at 8205 Jordy…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Florida v. JLSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. United States v. Robert Dale HollowayCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Trotter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Lindsey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. McDermott v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. CrabbIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Moise Joseph v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API