Legal Opinion

State v. Crabb

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 2005No. 10A01-0501-CR-45PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1069OPINION

KIRSCH, Chief Judge.

The State appeals a decision of the trial court to suppress evidence seized in a war-rantless search, which led to the charging of Seott Michael Crabb with dealing methamphetamine,1 a Class A felony, possession of methamphetamine,2 a Class C felony, and neglect of a dependant,3 a Class D felony. After the trial court granted Crabb's motion to suppress, the State dismissed its charges and filed this appeal. The dispositive issue on review is whether the smell of ether emanating from an apartment reported to house a small child constituted exigent cireumstances…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. VanWinkle v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. State v. StamperIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Smock v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Cudworth v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Holder v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. LitchfieldIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Peters v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Christopher Peelman v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. James Jay Green III v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API