Banning v. Sabin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of tbe district court for Eamsey county, where the action was tried by Brill, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Dickinson, J.1
The case, as presented on a former appeal in this action, is reported in 41 Minn. 477, (43 N. W. Rep. 329.) Upon the new trial which followed our decision on that appeal the findings of the court were in favor of the plaintiff. After the denial of a motion for a new trial, judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff for the recovery of the land which is the subject of the action, and declaring that the defendant had no estate, right, or lien in it. This is an appeal by the defendant from that judgment. A summary of the facts may be here stated:
In 1853, Fullerton, the owner of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Archambau v. GreenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Martin v. FridleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
- Benton v. NicollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- Banning v. SabinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
3Cited by6 opinions
- Davis v. SavageNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
- Horr v. HerringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Banning v. SabinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Creager v. Beamer SyndicateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Morford v. WellsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.