Martin v. Fridley
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Anoka county, entered on the report of a referee.
1Opinion of the CourtGtlfillan, C. J.
The facts presenting the questions which we deem it necessary to notice in this case are as follows : In July, 1855, the title to the premises in dispute was in A. M. Fridley and Charles L. Chase, and they executed a mortgage, duly recorded, upon the same and other parcels to one Nash, and the ownership of the mort*14gage afterwards passed by assignment to William Gemmell and Eobert Salmond, who, in 1859, instituted suit against the mortgagors and other parties to foreclose the mortgage. A decree for foreclosure and sale was entered January 19, 1860, and on April 28, 1860, the property was,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Benedict v. Gilman & CouchNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
- Gage v. . BrewsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Bradley v. SnyderIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
- Collins v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Johnson v. HarmonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Quinn Plumbing Co. Inc. v. New Miami Shores Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Key West Wharf & Coal Co. v. PorterSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
- Whitehead v. Fisher, Garrity & HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Bankers Surety Co. v. LinderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Foster v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.