Legal Opinion

Little Red River Levee District No. 2 v. Moore

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 12, 1940No. 4-5775PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The contracts out of which this litigation arose are sufficiently recited in the opinion on the former appeal. Little Red River Levee District No. 2 v. Moore, 197 Ark. 945, 126 S. W. 2d 605.

The contracts were construed in the former -opinion, and their specific performance was decreed, and the cause was remanded with the following directions: “The decree is reversed and the cause remanded, with directions to allow Moore and Bailey, or either of them, six months from the date of this opinion in which to pay the tax equivalents on so much of the land as was subject to the holdover privilege of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Luttrell v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  2. Hollingsworth v. McAndrewSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  3. Little Red River Levee District No. 2 v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  4. Felker v. McKeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dolphin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Turner v. Northwest Arkansas Neurosurgery Clinic, P.A.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Dolphin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Dolphin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API