Binh C. Tran v. V. Fonseca, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BINH C. TRAN, Case No.: 1:21-cv-00288-KES-CDB 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE 13 v. FOR A FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 14 V. FONSECA, et al., 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Binh C. Tran is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 When the parties indicated their wish to participate in an early settlement conference (see 21 Docs. 24 & 29), this case was scheduled…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- David P. Pagtalunan v. George Galaza, Warden Thomas Maddock, Acting Director, California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Gregory Carey v. John E. KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Chrysler Sales Corp. v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1925