Gregory Carey v. John E. King
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Carey appeals the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for failure to prosecute. He contends that the district court abused its discretion by dismissing his complaint sixty days after mail, addressed to him from the district court, was returned by the post office as undeliverable. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review a district court’s order dismissing an action for failure to prosecute for an abuse of discretion. Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 633, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1390, 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962); Ash v.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Henderson v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Hiram Ash v. Eugene CvetkovCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
3Cited by3,458 opinions
- In Re William EISEN, Debtor. Richard MONEYMAKER, Appellant, v. Melvyn J. CoBEN, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- William Morris Jeanne Morris v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Randal LongfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Casteel v. PieschekCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Mark A. Ball v. City of Chicago and Alfred S. Schultz, Individually and as Agent of the City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Safwat Soliman v. Mike Johanns, Secretary, United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
3,453 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.