Chrysler Sales Corp. v. Smith
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
LUSE, District Judge.
Complainant, a Michigan corporation, seeks to enjoin defendant from publicly asserting that insurance issued by the Palmetto Eire Insurance Company, a corporation of South Carolina, to Wisconsin residents owning Chrysler automobiles sold in Wisconsin, is so issued contrary to the laws of Wisconsin, and from threatening to prosecute Wisconsin dealers in Chrysler ears for violating Wisconsin statutes regulating the insurance business within the, state, to the irreparable damage to plaintiff’s business in the sale of Chrysler cars in Wisconsin. Complainant avers that the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Carpenter v. Providence Washington InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Aetna Life Insurance v. DunkenSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Connecticut General Life Ins. Co. v. BosemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
- City of Sheffield v. Home Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Chrysler Sales Corp. v. SpencerDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1925
- (PC)Wells v. NewsomDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Binh C. Tran v. V. Fonseca, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.