Legal Opinion

Buetow v. A.L.S. Enterprises, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 6, 2009No. Civ. No. 07-3970 (RHK/JJK)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This lawsuit concerns hunting clothing manufactured and/or sold by Defendants A.L.S. Enterprises, Inc. (“ALS”), Cabela’s, Inc. and Cabela’s Wholesale (referred to jointly as “Cabela’s”), and Gander Mountain Co. (“Gander Mountain”) (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiffs1 allege that Defendants have misrepresented that their clothing eliminates human odor and is capable of being “reactivated or regenerated in a household [clothes] dryer after the clothing has become saturated with odors.” (Sec. Am. Compl. (“Compl.”) ¶ 2.)…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. William Barnes v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  5. McLaughlin v. American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Farmington Hills Employees Retirement System v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
  2. In re Petters Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
  3. Buetow v. A.L.S. Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
  4. Luiken v. Domino's Pizza, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
  5. PHT Holding I LLC v. ReliaStar Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API