Legal Opinion
State v. Gustin
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 26, 1966PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.
The defendant was convicted of vagrancy under ORS 166.060 and from the judgment entered appeals.
The matter was tried to the trial court on the following stipulation:
“It is hereby stipulated by the parties to the above-entitled cause, by their respective attorneys, for the purpose of the trial of this action, that on the trial of the cause the following facts are admitted and agreed on by the parties:
“I
“That Opal Betty Gustin, on or about the 21st day of December, 1962, in the City of Portland, County of Multnomah, State of Oregon, did offer to engage in an act of illicit sexual intercourse,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fahnestock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- State v. RuhlSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
- Barnett v. PhelpsOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- State v. StoyellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1866
- Davis v. SladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. CariagaIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. PerryOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. CariagaIdaho Supreme Court · 1974