State v. Perry
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of the crime of vagrancy in being a common prostitute (ORS 166.060).
A police officer with the vice division of the Portland Police Bureau, struck up a conversation with defendant in a Portland bar. He asked her if she knew the whereabouts of a certain girl (a prostitute with whom he had previously made contact). Defendant said, “Maybe I better be talking to you.” The rest of the episode was described by the police officer as follows :
“A * * * [Tjhen she says, ‘Are you looking for a girl?’ Or a lady, one of the two, and I says, ‘Yeah, I guess I…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- People v. BabbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Ferguson v. Superior Court of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- State v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Commonwealth v. TomasselliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. CariagaIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. CariagaIdaho Supreme Court · 1974