People v. Young
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
The information charges a burglary,, in that the defendant, etc., did feloniously, etc., enter “the building, to wit, the ticket office of the Central Pacific Railroad Company, a corporation,” etc., with intent then and therein to commit larceny.
The evidénce showed that the outer door of the house at the railway station led into a waiting-room for passengers, and in this room was a door leading into an inner room—the “ticket office” — from which the- evidence tended to prove the goods were stolen.
1. The information charged an intent to commit larceny. The court was therefore…
2Cited by25 opinions
- People v. SparksCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- People v. MacKabeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- People v. ColbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. GarrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.