Legal Opinion
Armour-Dial, Inc. v. Alkar Engineering Corp.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided April 25, 1979No. 75-C-365PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.
The defendant Alkar, a division of DEC International, Inc. (Alkar-DEC), has moved for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint, as currently amended, and the cross-claim of the defendant Bonewitz Chemical Services, Inc. (Bonewitz), pursuant to Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, insofar as those parties assert claims against Alkar-DEC.
Alkar-DEC is the successor of Alkar Engineering Corporation (Alkar), which allegedly improperly designed and constructed a continuous smokehouse for the plaintiff. Its status as successor is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Raymond Leannais and Catherine Leannais v. Cincinnati, Incorporated and Cincinnati-Forte Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Charles Travis and Jean Travis v. Harris Corp., Harris-Intertype Corporation, Sheridan Division and Bruno MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- McKee v. Harris-Seybold Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Forest Laboratories, Inc., (Cross Appellant) v. The Pillsbury Company, (Cross Appellee)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bud Antle, Inc. v. Eastern Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Baltimore Luggage Co. v. HoltzmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Select Creations, Inc. v. Paliafito America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1994
- Gallenberg Equipment, Inc. v. Agromac International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1998
- Keller v. Clark Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.