Legal Opinion

Rossow Oil Co. v. Heiman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1976No. 75-35PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

Five issues are presented on this appeal:

1. Does the existence of a franchise or dealership arrangement, absent statutory provisions, preclude the use of summary eviction from real property?

2. Are the dealership regulations of ch. 185, Stats., in effect for the arrangement existing here ?

8. Has the appellant established a valid counterclaim for damages arising from the eviction due to a fiduciary relationship or statutory duty?

4. Has the appellant established a valid and cognizable counterclaim for damages under federal regulations ?

5. Is promissory estoppel available as a counterclaim remedy…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Wagner v. KeplerIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Forrer v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Dickhut v. NortonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Bratt v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bush v. National School Studios, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Schade v. DiethrichArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Foerster, Inc. v. Atlas Metal Parts Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Boatland, Inc. And Robert L. Moore v. Brunswick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  5. U.S. Oil Co. v. Midwest Auto Care Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API