Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Jenkins v. Tyack

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1985No. 84-1558PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

The issue before us is whether, in the absence of an abuse of discretion, mandamus may be utilized to collaterally attack a decision by the Court of Claims in an action initiated under the Victims of Crime Act. For the reasons set forth below we decline to allow mandamus to be so utilized.

R.C. 2743.20 specifies in pertinent part: “The decision of the court of claims with respect to an appeal from a decision of the court of claims commissioners is final, and no appeal from the decision of the court of claims lies to any other court.” Relator cannot, therefore, appeal from the decision of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In re RiosOhio Court of Claims · 1983
  3. State ex rel. Sawyer v. O'ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State ex rel. Gibbons v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. In re EaderOhio Court of Claims · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ferguson v. Court of ClaimsOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State ex rel. Brennan v. Vinton County Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State Ex Rel. Thomson v. Clerk, Court of ClaimsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Kent v. Central Benefits Mut. Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Bernard v. KainradOhio Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API