Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Best Buy Co.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 12, 2012No. 20110182-CAPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

DAVIS, Judge:

{ 1 Hugo and Claudia Martinez appeal the trial court's ruling in favor of Best Buy Co. on claims the Martinezes brought under seetion 183-11-4 of the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act (the UCSPA), which proseribes "deceptive act[s] or practice[s] by a supplier in connection with a consumer transaction," see Utah Code Ann. § 13-11-4(1) (Supp. 2011). We affirm.

T2 On March 6, 2008, the Martinezes applied for a Best Buy credit card, which was issued by a credit card company called HSBC. 1 In filling out the application, Claudia Martinez signed up for an "account…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Freecom Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. Sosa v. PaulosUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. MacKay v. HardyUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Carlie v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Wade v. JobeUtah Supreme Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Berneike v. CitiMortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. Midland Funding LLC v. SotolongoCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  3. Fell v. Alco Capital GroupCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
  4. Gallegos v. LVNV Funding LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2016
  5. Pace v. Link Debt RecoveryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API