Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Wetherell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 2, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.

There was sufficient evidence to warrant a finding of guilty of the offence charged in the complaint under G. L. c. 271, § 5, which, omitting that part of the complaint descriptive of the offence of keeping “a common gaming house,” was in these words: “commonly keeps or suffers to be kept in a building or place actually used and occupied by her, tables or other apparatus for the purpose of playing at an unlawful game or sport for money . . ..”

The defendant testified that she was the president and treasurer of Moonbeam Inc., and in control of its premises at 59 Short Street, Taunton, on April…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JenskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  2. Commonwealth v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  3. Commonwealth v. KimballMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Commonwealth v. McCluskeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  5. Commonwealth v. PasqualeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Club Caravan, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  2. Commonwealth v. BoyleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  3. Commonwealth v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  4. Commonwealth v. BerwickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  5. Brockton Hous. Auth. v. MelloMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API