Legal Opinion

Brockton Hous. Auth. v. Mello

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 26, 2018No. 16–P–1708Published

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

*682Three months into Keith G. Mello's occupancy of a one-bedroom apartment at the Caffrey Towers development (premises or apartment), the Brockton Housing Authority (BHA) filed an action pursuant to G. L. c. 139, § 19, to void his tenancy. Following a trial, a judge of the Southeastern Housing Court ruled that Mello "engaged in conduct, and allowed his guests to engage in conduct, which constitutes the keeping of controlled *683substances in the premises." She entered a judgment voiding the lease and permanently enjoining Mello from entering any portion of Caffrey Towers, a Federally subsidized…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Assessor of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Custody of Two MinorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. HendricksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  4. Chase v. Proprietors of the Revere HouseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  5. Commonwealth v. BuckleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API