Commonwealth v. Adams
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtBarker, J.
The defendant was convicted under Pub. Sts. c. 99, § 10, as amended by St. 1887, c. 448, § 2, of being present in a common gaming-house when gaming implements were found there. He contends that the presiding justice should have ruled that, as matter of law, the furniture, blackboard, sheets, manifold book, and policy slips found in the room when he was arrested were not implements of gaming within the meaning of the statute, because not essential in the game which the evidence tended to show was played there. But if an article is ordinarily used in playing an unlawful game, it may be an…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Finnegan v. Fall River Gas Works Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nugent v. Boston Consolidated Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- State ex rel. City of Milwaukee v. NewmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. EngemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- E. J. Fitzwilliam Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Commonwealth v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.