Legal Opinion

People v. McCoy

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 22, 1974No. Crim. 23609PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEPHENS, J.

By information, defendant and codefendant (not a party to this appeal) were charged in count I with offering to sell'and having sold a restricted dangerous drug (sodium secobarbital), in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11912 (now § 11379), and in count II, with unlawful possession of marijuana, in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11530 (now § 11357). The jury found defendant guilty of possession of a restricted dangerous drug, a necessarily included but lesser offense than that charged in count I. Defendant was acquitted of the offense charged in…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. People v. FiskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API