Legal Opinion

People v. Adams

California Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1993No. S030824PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

Penal Code section 12022.11 permits the imposition of an additional two-year term (enhancement) to be served consecutively to the term being imposed for a criminal offense (secondary offense), and for consecutive service of the secondary offense term, if the defendant committed the secondary offense while on bail or own recognizance release pending trial or appeal on another charge (primary offense).2 The People must charge the enhancement in the information or indictment charging the secondary *573offense and, unless admitted by the defendant, must prove the truth of the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People v. HinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. CrossCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. People v. FarwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API