Legal Opinion

People v. Hall

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 24, 1979No. Crim. 33783PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALARCON, J.

Defendant was charged in an information with violation of section 261, subdivision 2 and section 261, subdivision 3 of the Penal Code, rape, and violation of section 288a, subdivision (c), forcible oral copulation. Prior to trial, the People’s motion to amend the information was granted, to allege a violation of Penal Code section 12022.7, the infliction of great bodily injury during the commission of the rape.

Defendant was tried by a jury and found guilty of both counts; the jury found that the allegation of infliction of great bodily injury was true.

Defendant was sentenced…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. People v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. SearsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. In Re MosleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. People v. RobertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. People v. Superior Court (Mendella)California Supreme Court · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API