Legal Opinion

State v. Mound

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1937No. File No. 8055PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER 'CURIAM.

Defendant -was convicted of the crime of perjury. The appeal is from the judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

The principal errors assigned deal with the sufficiency of the evidence. It is disclosed by the record that no application was made for a new trial until several months after the entry of judgment, and that the application as made was not based upon newly discovered evidence. The trial court was without jurisdiction to hear such a motion after the expiration of the time fixed by section 4946 of the Revised Code of 1919. State v. Parlin, 64 S. D. 572,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. KirbySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  2. State v. StoneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State v. KeebleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  4. State v. HolbornSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  5. City of Sioux Falls v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HillArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API