Legal Opinion
United States v. Heredia-Cruz
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 15, 2003No. 02-2009PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this court determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Or. R. 34.1(G). Accordingly, on February 11, 2003, this court ordered the case submitted without oral argument.
Defendant-Appellant Manuel Heredia-Cruz appeals from his sentence after a jury convicted him of illegally re-entering the country after previously being convicted of an aggravated felony in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a)(1) and (2) and 8 U.S.C. § 1324. On…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Cabrera-SosaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Sherron K. BallardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. GauvinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Steve RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. KornegayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- United States v. MarquezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. SalasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Francis Edward SpringfieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Lizarraga-OrdunoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.