Legal Opinion

United States v. Lizarraga-Orduno

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 13, 2004No. 04-2038PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

BRORBY, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Appellant Jose Rolando Lizarraga-Orduno pled guilty to reentry of a deported alien previously convicted of an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)(1) and (b)(2). He now appeals his forty-one-month sentence, contending the district court erred in: 1)…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. Joe Luis SaucedoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Bonard Ray DeninnoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Faris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Faris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Lizarraga-Orduno v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. United States v. Lizarraga-OrdunoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Lizarraga-OrdunoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API