Legal Opinion

Hamill v. Peck

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1898No. 1320PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Clear Creek County.

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

July 25, 1889, in the district court of Clear Creek county, appellant Hamill, who is a defendant in this suit, recovered judgment against appellee Peek for $2,088.50, and costs. *2May 25, 1892, Peck paid thereon $750, for which he received credit. May 13, 1895, in a suit pending in the district court of Arapahoe county, judgment was rendered in favor of one Fred W• Cline, and against Hamill, for an amount exceeding $4,000. On May 25, 1895, execution issued on this judgment. On the same day garnishee summons was thereunder served upon plaintiff Peck, who immediately filed answer thereto…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Beaston v. Farmers' Bank of Del.Supreme Court of the United States · 1838
  2. Bowne v. JoyNew York Supreme Court · 1812
  3. Bissell v. KipNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  4. Prescott v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  5. Gager v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1836

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Elson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  2. Boyle v. Musser-Sauntry Land, Logging & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. McNish v. BurchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Eisenstadt Manufacturing Co. v. St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API