Legal Opinion
Warren v. Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 29, 1896PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEILL, Associate Justice.
— This suit was brought by the appellant Mrs. M- A. Warren against the appellee on the insurance policy described in the agreement hereinafter copied. Mrs. Forest L. Williams intervened, admitting the right of the plaintiff to recover to the extent of the indebtedness of the former to the latter, asking judgment on the policy for the residuum. The case was tried on the agreement set out below, and judgment rendered in favor of the insurance company, from which we have this appeal.
The following is the agreement:
“It is agreed by and .between M. A. Warren and J. F.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Riddlesbarger v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Griffey v. New York Central InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Western & A. Pipe Lines v. Home Ins., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County1891
- Chandler v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- Baley v. . Homestead Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bridges v. Commercial Standard Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Kludt v. German Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Firemen's Fund Insurance v. SimsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Rolater v. RolaterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Mercury Fire Ins. Co. v. DunawayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.