Hunnicutt v. Myers
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*85KISTLER, J.
Petitioner challenges the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for Initiative Petition 80 (2006). Because the ballot title does not substantially comply with the standards set out in ORS 250.035(2), we refer the ballot title to the Attorney General for modification.
Initiative Petition 80, if enacted, would affect a public body’s authority to regulate the use of real property.1 The proposed measure has two main parts. First, the proposed measure would prevent a public body from waiving existing land use laws2 and relieve it of its obligation under those laws to pay just…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kain v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- Kain v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- Terhune v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2005
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wolf v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- Carley/Towers v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Hunnicutt v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Hunnicutt v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Hunnicutt v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.