Legal Opinion

Hunnicutt v. Myers

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 2006No. SC S52978PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*100KISTLER, J.

Petitioner challenges the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for Initiative Petition 81 (2006). Because the ballot title does not substantially comply with the standards set out in ORS 250.035(2), we refer the ballot title to the Attorney General for modification.

The proposed measure at issue in this case duplicates in large part the proposed measure at issue in Hunnicutt v. Myers (S52977), 340 Or 83, 127 P3d 1182 (2006) (Initiative Petition 80 (2006)).1 The proposed measure would eliminate a public body’s statutory obligation to pay just compensation or waive the land use…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kain v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Hunnicutt v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hunnicutt v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API