Legal Opinion

Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Rawlings

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 22, 1935No. 7433PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff’s suit was in equity for a set-off, and to redeem collateral held in pledge. His bill admitted that the First. National Bank in Gulfport, of which he was receiver, owed the defendant as assignee of the Canal Bank & Trust Company, a Louisiana state bank, $13,067.77, fully secured. It alleged that the Canal Bank was the owner of the 256 shares of the Gulfport Bank in the name of Wendell, and as such owed an assessment of $6,290.35. Tendering the difference, it prayed for an order of discharge from the debt, and for the delivery up of the note and collateral.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. California Bank v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. PottorffSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Concord First National Bank v. HawkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. McDonald v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Witters v. SowlesUnited States Circuit Court · 1887

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nettles v. RhettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  2. Dixon v. CannonDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1940
  3. Dixon v. DialDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API