Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Dial

District Court, E.D. South Carolina

Decided August 3, 1938No. 4138Published

1Opinion of the Court

MYERS, District Judge.

By a motion filed under Section 470 of the South Carolina Code of Civil Procedure (1932), the plaintiff herein has moved to strike the answer filed by the defendant as sham and irrelevant and in the event such motion is granted for judgment against the defendant in accordance with the practice sanctioned in Interstate Chemical Corporation v. Farmington Corporation, 100 S.C. 196, 84 S.E. 710. The motion was heard before me upon the verified pleadings in the cause and upon an affidavit of the plaintiff to which are annexed certain exhibits.

From the record before me, it…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Early v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Barth v. PockMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  3. In the Matter of the Reciprocity BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  4. Alderman v. AldermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  5. Seabury v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API