Legal Opinion

Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 17, 1999No. 95-07510; CA A95905PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*47EDMONDS, J.

Employer seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) order ruling that claimant is entitled to temporary disability benefits as of May 11, 1993. We review for errors of law, ORS 656.298(7) and ORS 183.482(8), and reverse.

Claimant has a compensable right wrist condition. The claim was initially closed in 1992. In May 1993, claimant filed an aggravation claim and a request for surgery, which employer denied. The denial was set aside by the Hearings Division, and employer appealed to the Board, which affirmed. That order has become final. In May 1995, claimant requested…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Volk v. America West AirlinesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. Lebanon Plywood v. SeiberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Jensen v. Conagra, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Santos v. Caryall TransportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Shaw v. RebholzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Menasha Corp. v. CrawfordOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Morales v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Menasha Corp. v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Menasha Corp. v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. BundyOregon Supreme Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API