Legal Opinion

Menasha Corp. v. Crawford

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 2001No. WCB 98-03327; CA A105040; SC S47076PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

The issue in this workers’ compensation case is whether claimant is entitled to receive nearly two years’ worth of temporary total disability (TTD) benefits, based on a physician’s after-the-fact certification that claimant had been disabled for that period. An administrative law judge (ALJ) and the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) held that claimant was entitled to temporary compensation for the period in question. The Court of Appeals reversed. Menasha Corp. v. Crawford, 164 Or App 174, 988 P2d 451 (1999). We allowed claimant’s petition for review and now affirm the decision of the Court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. BundyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Menasha Corp. v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lederer v. Viking Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Holdren v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Rodriguez v. Keystone RV - Thor IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API