Legal Opinion

United States v. Gigante

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 21, 1997No. CR 93-368(JBW)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge.

This case raises an issue of apparent first impression in the federal courts. A chief witness in this RICO case is too ill to testify in court. He is in the Federal Witness Protection Program, at some distance from this state so that the jury cannot be convened in his presence. It might jeopardize the safety of the witness were the defendant’s full counsel staff to be present at the witness’ deposition since that would reveal the witness’ location and put him in serious danger from criminals against whom he has testified and provided…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Lee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. Michael Lee Matthews and Robert G. PraterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Vincent Gigante, Also Known as "Chin,"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  2. Eller v. Trans Union, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  3. Harrell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  4. Jelinek v. CostelloDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  5. In Re Vioxx Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API