Legal Opinion
In Re Vioxx Products Liability Litigation
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided June 29, 2006No. MDL No. 1657PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
439 F.Supp.2d 640 (2006)
In re VIOXX PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION.
This Document Relates To: Barnett
v.
Merck & Co., Inc., 06-485.
MDL No. 1657.
United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana.
June 29, 2006.
ORDER AND REASONS
FALLON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Plaintiff Steering Committee's ("PSC") Motion to Compel the Appearance of David Anstice (Rec.Doc.4352, pp. 13-24). For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
Mr. Anstice is currently Merck & Co., Inc.'s ("Merck") President of Human Health for Canada, Latin America, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand. Prior to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Napier v. BossardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Edwards v. LoganDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1999
- United States v. GiganteDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Argonaut Insurance Company v. Manetta Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2020
- BEAL v. 3M COMPANYDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2022
- Etienne Jean Poix v. Espaillat SantanaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- House v. Player's Dugout, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2021
- In Re: RFC and RESCAP Liquidating Trust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.