State v. Menz
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, C. J.
Dale Wayne Menz appeals his conviction for manufacture of marijuana. He contends that the trial court erred in refusing to suppress evidence seized in a war-rantless search of his home. We affirm.
On January 23, 1992, at 5:30 p.m., an anonymous caller called the Hoquiam police to report domestic violence in progress at 2639 Sumner. Although unsure, the caller thought the participants wére named Debbie and Dale, and that a 10-year-old child lived with them. The caller was unsure about the presence of weapons. 2639 Sumner was the address of Dale Menz.
When three officers responded, they found…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. LoewenWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. GockenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- State v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- State v. RainesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- State v. AcreyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. AcreyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. KinzyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. RyonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. SadlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.