Legal Opinion

Continental Life Ins. Co. v. Smith

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1936No. 4160PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICE, Justice.

This suit was brought by appellee against appellant to recover on a note for $9,740.92, and to foreclose a mortgagee deed securing it. The appellant answered, claiming damages because of breach of a contract to convey the same and other real estate described in-the mortgage, made prior to the execution to appellant of a deed to the property, and the note and mortgage in suit; by reason of which it is claimed nothing is due on the note. By cross-action appellant sued to cancel the note and mortgage in suit and to recover damages for such breach, in excess of the amount due…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Phillips & Colby Construction Co. v. SeymourSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Jones & Carey v. RisleyTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. BelcherTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Blake-McFall Co. v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Morris v. . WhitcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1859

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Maxey v. QuintanaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Ute Park Summer Homes Ass'n v. Maxwell Land Grant Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Jolley v. Idaho Securities, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Everett v. GillilandNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Duvall v. StoneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API