Legal Opinion
Beta Systems, Inc. v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 31, 1989No. 87-1108, 87-1274PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Beta Systems, Inc. requests attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (1985), incurred in connection with Counts I and III of the Claims Court litigation and our decision in Beta Systems, Inc. v. United States, 838 F.2d 1179 (Fed.Cir.1988). That decision reversed the Claims Court’s summary judgment on liability, and granted the relief requested by Beta Systems as to Counts I and III. Count II had been severed, and no fees with respect thereto are included in this petition.
The underlying dispute turned on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Beta Systems, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Massachusetts Fair Share v. Law Enforcement Assistance AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Charles E. Gavette v. Office of Personnel Management and Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Community Heating & Plumbing Company, Inc. v. H. Lawrence Garrett, Iii, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Applegate v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Griffin & Dickson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- CEMS, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- KMS Fusion, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.