Legal Opinion

Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. Rowell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 3, 1963No. 5-3013PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDIN, Justice.

The appellant insists that there was no sufficient evidence offered by appellee to take this case to the jury. In 1949 appellant, Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Association of Omaha, Nebraska (hereinafter called “Mutual”), for value received, issued to the appellee, Hendrix Rowell, then 41 years of age and a practicing attorney, two policies of insurance, the pertinent provisions of which will be subsequently discussed; and Mr. Rowell regularly paid all premiums due on the policies and was at all times well and active until June 1958. One morning when he attempted to arise…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. OCCIDENTAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. OF CAL. v. SammonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  2. Queen of Arkansas Insurance v. MaloneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  3. Western Coal & Mining Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  4. Grabove v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. Mcgee v. SmithermanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Blissett v. FrisbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  2. Cassady v. United Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1974
  3. Gurantee Trust Life Ins. v. KoenigSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  4. GUARANTEE TRUST LIFE INS. CO. OF CHICAGO, ILL. v. KoenigSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  5. Elam v. First Unum Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API