Legal Opinion

Provident Life Acc. Ins. Co. v. Downey

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1942No. 6 Div. 982PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The action was upon a policy of insurance to recover the benefit payable for the loss of the entire sight of one eye, resulting directly and exclusively of all other causes from bodily injury sustained solely through external, violent and accidental means. The policy had a further clause stipulating that disability due partly to accidental injury and partly to disease or bodily infirmity was not within the coverage of the policy.

Appellant earnestly insists it was entitled to the affirmative charge, with hypothesis. The refusal of such charge presents the main question in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cross v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Grabove v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ellis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. Holloway v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Liberty National Life Insurance Company v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  4. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. BoyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. American Life Ins. Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API