Legal Opinion

Annunziato v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1996PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

O’Brien, J.

The plaintiffs in these four consolidated actions claim injuries to themselves and their decedents from the latent effects of exposure to toxic substances deposited at Staten Island landfills. The primary issue presented on appeal is whether the personal injury claims of 11 of the plaintiffs in Action No. 1 should be dismissed as untimely under the “date of discovery” rule in CPLR 214-c. We conclude that these plaintiffs’ claims are time barred under CPLR 214-c (3), and their allegation that they have not, as yet, discovered the cause of their injuries precludes…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Jensen v. General Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Prink v. Rockefeller Center, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Rodriguez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Sweeney v. General Printing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Rothstein v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nonnon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Pompa v. Burroughs Wellcome Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Perry v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Suffolk County Water Authority v. Dow Chemical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. In Re Pfohl Bros. Landfill LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API