Legal Opinion

Jensen v. General Electric Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1993PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bellacosa, J.

The phrase "injury to property” in the date of discovery Statute of Limitations, CPLR 214-c (2), embraces actions for damages ensuing from exposure to any substance, including those characterized as continuing trespass and nuisance. Thus, in this action for compensatory and injunctive relief due to hazardous waste contamination of the plaintiffs’ property, we conclude that the order of the Appellate Division should be modified by reversing so much as reinstated the plaintiffs’ causes of action for damages based on continuing trespass and nuisance.

I

From 1958 to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Victorson v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Schwartz v. Heyden Newport Chemical Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. Galway v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Gordon & Breach Science Publishers S.A. v. American Institute of PhysicsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  3. Weiner v. Lenox Hill HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Bano v. Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  5. Matter of Ny County Des Litig.New York Court of Appeals · 1997

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API