Legal Opinion

Myers Park Homes Co. v. Falls

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 29, 1922PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal by defendants from Webb, J., at October Term, 1922, of MECKLENBUEG. Controversy without action, submitted on an agreed statement of facts, the material parts of which are stated in the opinion. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.

The following statement of the facts, taken from the case agreed, will suffice for our present decision:

On 1 April, 1922, defendants entered into a written contract whereby they agreed to purchase from the plaintiff a house and lot in a subdivision of Myers Park, a residential section near the city of Charlotte, N. 0. Plaintiff executed and tendered deed, sufficient in form, to the defendants, who have refused to accept same, contending that the title to said property is defective. This suit is brought to compel specific performance. The locus in quo is known and designated as lot G in block…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tallmadge v. . the East River BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Collins v. Asheville Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  3. Elizabeth City v. . CommanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. Finch v. . GreggSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  5. Wheeler v. Charlotte Consolidated Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Higdon v. JaffaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Craven County v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Tull v. Doctors Building, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Sedberry v. ParsonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Hawthorne v. Realty Syndicate, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API